Short Term Scientific Missions (STSM) are exchange visits aimed at supporting individual mobility, strengthening existing networks and fostering collaboration between Researchers. A STSM should specifically contribute to the scientific goal of the COST Action, whilst at the same time allowing those partaking in the missions to learn new techniques, gain access to specific data, instruments and / or methods not available in their own institutions / organisations.
For further details, please consult the COST Vademecum.
Past STSM are listed below: links to abstracts of the reports where the mission is complete will be added shortly.
STSM applicants must be engaged in an official research programme as a PhD Student or postdoctoral fellow or can be employed by, or affiliated to, an Institution or legal entity which has within its remit a clear association with performing research. The institutions / organisations where applicants pursue their main strand of research are considered as Home institutions. The Host institution is the institution / organization that will host the successful applicant.
STSM must respect the following criteria:
Please consult the COST Vademecum
STSM Grants do not necessarily cover all expenses related to performing a given mission. The Grant is a contribution to the overall travel, accommodation and meal expenses of the Grantee.
The calculation of the financial contribution for each STSM must respect the following criteria:
Please consult the COST Vademecum
Relation with the Action’s goals
Each STSM call (one expected in each of the four Grant Periods of the Action) will give specific instructions on how to apply. You can refer to the the news section of this website for our most recent call (NB: it usually includes a link to a document with further information regarding the STSM programme and the eligibility criteria).
Please note, priority is given to those applications that proactively address the agendas of the individual Working Groups, available on this website. Action Affiliates, who have access to the Private Forum, will also see what work on the specific agendas has already been carried out, and which points have received little attention so far.
To facilitate this process, potential applicants are invited to contact the Action Chair, Vice-Chair or the relevant Working Group Leaders. Before making contact, potential applicants should study the Working Group agendas carefully, and consider which ones relate most closely to the research they propose to undertake. They may also wish to study documentation from the successful applications in 2015, all of which relate to the Working Group agendas in the manner envisaged (unlike the applications for 2014, in which relating to WG agendas was not a selection criterion).
Potential applicants should then draft a brief account of their intentions before making contact and requesting feedback on it. This process will help ensure that the outcomes and deliverables of the STSMs are devoted to benefitting the Action as a whole.
Potential applicants from East-Central Europe and those with no previous contact with this COST Action are explicitly encouraged to make use of this opportunity.
What does a successful application look like?
A successful application balances emphasis on the candidate’s personal research project with consideration of the way in which it could contribute to the work of the Action. It addresses specific tasks included on one or more Working Group agenda in a very concrete and focused way: a concentrated contribution to advancing one very specific agenda is likely to be more useful to the project than an attempt to address multiple agendas simultaneously.
A successful proposal will develop a realistic work plan resulting in specific deliverables, which very often includes a brief paper, posted in the Action’s Member’s section, making recommendations on how to resolve a particular issue. Proposals are typically 2-3 pages and should not be more than 5. They can take the form of a separate document, or be included in the letter of motivation.
For a step-by-step guidance you may want to refer to the most recent STSM call in the news section of this website.
Grant Period 1 (successful projects)
|BUNING, Robin||NL||UK||Inventory of the correspondence of Isaac Vossius primarily in Amsterdam, Leiden and Oxford, leveraged with additional funding from the Scaliger Institute in Leiden and CofK in Oxford|
|FEOLA, Vittoria||AT||IT||Inventory and digital archive from the Bartolomeo Gamba collection, now in Bassano del Grappa, with additional resources from the ÖNB in Vienna, the University of Padua, and CofK in Oxford|
|GURRIERI, Marco||FR||IT||Archival research on letters of French musicians in Northern Italy|
|MÄKELÄ, Eetu||FIN||UK||Extended consultation on and experimenting with linked open data as a means of modelling, ingesting, analyzing, and visualizing epistolary and prosopographical metadata in Early Modern Letters Online|
|STORCHOVÁ, Lucie||CZ||UK||Research on correspondence relating to Melanchthon and his influence in the kingdom of Bohemia; historiographical and methodological issues relating to the republic of letters|
|URBANO, Pedro||PT||SP||Research on methodology and training on digital tools for the analysis of early modern women’s letters|
Grant Period 2 (successful projects)
|BUTTERWORTH, Alex||UK||IT||The Shape of a Life at the Margins of the Republic of Letters [WG6 et al.]|
|COOLEY, Mackenzie||IT||SP||Mapping Relaciones geograficas in Philip II New Spain [WG2,4]|
|HARRIS, Joanna||UK||NL||Letters of Hugh Goodyear [WGs 2,3,4]|
|HOLLEWAND, Karen||UK||NL||Addition of keywords to correspondence metadata [WG3]|
|JENSEN, Mikkel Munthe||IT||UK||Prosopographical study using data modelling [WG2]|
|LELKOVÁ, Iva||CZ||IT||Visualization of Early Modern Correspondence [WG1,2,6]|
|POPOVA, Plamena||BG||UK||Developing of Open policy for metadata’ sharing within digital platforms [WG5]|
|TOUBER, Jetze||NL||UK||Prosopographical Profiling of Subgroups in Correspondences [WG2]|
|BERGERS, Lara||NL||UK||Jumpstarting the Republic of Letters’ Printed Library. Towards answering Big Questions about the size of the Network [WG4]|
|RUSINEK, Sinai||IL||DE||Application of text reuse detection and visualization methods to correspondence corpora [WG3]|
|MOJET, Emma||NL||UK||Accessing texts. Reassembling the Republic of Letters’ printed letters|
|VOGELER, Georg||AT||UK||ProDomo: Building a prosopographical database of members of the religious orders|
|TUOMINEN, Jouni||FI||UK||EMLO prosopographical data model – Towards a Biographical Conceptual Reference Model|
|BELLIGNACCI, Roberto||NL||IT||Adding it up: Visualising the Republic of Letters’ epistolaries and calculating their contents|
|LEWIS, Miranda||UK||NL||Charting the Mapping of Unstructured to Structured Data: the potential for data-mining and topic-modelling in a union catalogue of correspondence|
|MROZIK, Dagmar||DE||AT||Digital prosopographies of religious orders in early modern Europe|
|STORCHOVÁ, Lucie||CZ||NL||Design sprint ‘Mapping Unstructured to Structured Data‘|
Grant Period 3 (successful projects)
|MONTCHER, Fabien||ES||PT||Iberian Scholars and Vicente Nogueira`s Correspondence (1586-1654) [WG4]|
|WALDEN, Justine||UK||IT||Letter Collections Census, Italy|
|WON, Miguel||PT||UK||Towards a methodology for the identification, extraction and analysis of place in the Republic of Letters|
|PETROLINI, Chiara||IT||AT||Applying Transkribus’s Annotation Functionality to ÖNB Cod. 9737t|
|MANTEGARI, Glauco||IT||UK||Extracting and visualizing structured data|
|JENSEN, Mikkel Munthe||IT||UK||Prosopographies of Academics|
|ASPAAS, Per Pippin||NO||CH||Astronomia disciplina maxime oecumenica? [WG4]|
|SPADINI, Elena||IT||NL||Comparative analysis of digital letter edition platforms|
|ASTOLA, Mandi||NL||UK||EROL for Italy|
|FROHN, Celine||NL||UK||EROL for England|
|MARTINEZ, Gabriela||ES||UK||Adapting Cultures of Knowledge Prosopographical Data Model for Women|